Posted on April 2, 2009 by Taylor Adkins
The following is an early attempt at a succinct elaboration of what could be considered the early roots of non-philosophy. Almost epigrammatic in its economy, this account at least has the benefit of formulating its approach in the form of rules which are not simply prescriptive but productive and indicative of a transformation of the [...]
Filed under: Laruelle, epistemology, non-philosophy, transcendental | Tagged: Laruelle, non-philosophy, transcendental method, translation, transvaluation | 1 Comment »
Posted on April 1, 2009 by Taylor Adkins
Over at Stellar Cartographies there is a new post (called: Speculative realism, stamp collecting, and the question of Science) that goes into great detail about Gabriel Catren’s critique of Meillassoux on the basis of theoretical physics and quantum mechanics (lovingly dubbed by the former as “speculative physics”). The majority of the post (in reality almost [...]
Filed under: Uncategorized | Tagged: Gabriel Catren, Meillassoux, physics, speculative realism | 2 Comments »
Posted on March 12, 2009 by Taylor Adkins
(Non-)One
Other name for unilaterality, form of suspension or invalidation which, no longer arising from Being but from the One, is a mode of the One’s being-foreclosed, either real and not effectuated (“uni-laterality”), or transcendental and effectuated by the occasion of philosophical “nothingness” (“unilaterality”). It testifies to the primacy of (real) foreclosure over the (philosophical) negation.
From [...]
Filed under: Uncategorized | Tagged: (non-)One, dictionary, europanalysis, first name, language-universe, non-philosophy, non-rhetoric | Leave a Comment »
Posted on March 5, 2009 by Taylor Adkins
Transcendental (Pure Transcendental Identity)
First instance after the Real or the One constitutive of the subject as force (of) thought. It is the clone of the transcendental Unity proper to the philosophical Decision and produced by the vision-in-One on the basis of this symptomatic indication. Transcendental Identity is no longer the transcendental One of philosophy associated [...]
Filed under: Laruelle, non-philosophy, transcendental | Tagged: Generalization, Laruelle, Lived Experience, non-philosophy, Sense (of) Identity, Solitude, transcendental | Leave a Comment »
Posted on March 5, 2009 by Taylor Adkins
Hypothesis (Philosophizing-by-Hypothesis)
“Applied” or variant usage of non-philosophy (proposed by A.F. Schmid) that adds to its axioms a supplementary axiom bearing upon the philosophical Decision: that of the de jure multiplicity of philosophical decisions. This axiom is simultaneously added to those of the vision-in-One and those formalizing the philosophical Decision.
This problem has no meaning in philosophy [...]
Filed under: Laruelle, axiomatic, non-philosophy | Leave a Comment »
Posted on March 4, 2009 by Taylor Adkins
Presentation (Non-autopositional Presentation)
Immanent structure of reference of non-philosophical statements. It is a clone or reflection-without-reflecting, a theoretical givenness effectuated by and as the force (of) thought.
The metaphysics of Representation, or of autopositional representation as primary presence of the World, established itself in the 17th century. It is rediscovered beyond the doctrinal differences in every classical [...]
Filed under: Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »
Posted on March 3, 2009 by Taylor Adkins
Thought (Continent of Thought)
Uni-versalized concept, identically equivalent for philosophical thought and scientific knowledge. Thought is in this sense that which is determined-in-the-last-instance or cloned from these two disciplines.
The relations of thought and the real are given by the Parmenidian matrix: “Being and Thinking are the Same.” Thought and Being are in a relation of reciprocal [...]
Filed under: Uncategorized | Tagged: immanence, non-philosophy, primacy, priority, Real, science, thought | Leave a Comment »
Posted on February 20, 2009 by Taylor Adkins
Determination-in-the-last-instance (DLI)
Central concept, along with the One-in-One, of non-philosophy that distinguishes it from all philosophies. It is said of the causality proper to the One as such or vision-in-One, of the Real in virtue of its primacy over thought and its object (like Being). This causality exerts itself upon what is given as non(-One) and [...]
Filed under: determination-in-the-last-instance, immanence | Tagged: chora, definitions, determination-in-the-last-instance, epistemic break, radical immanence | Leave a Comment »
Posted on February 17, 2009 by Taylor Adkins
Laruelle, Francois. “Mon Parmenide.” La Decision philosophique 7 (1989): 105-114.
On the argument: The One is One because it is One rather than because it is or is Other.
Non-Parmenidian Axioms
1. If the One (etc.), the One is the real identity that founds a transcendental rather than logical axiomatic.
2. If the One (…), and if Parmenides says [...]
Filed under: Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »
Posted on February 16, 2009 by Taylor Adkins
Distance (Non-Phenomenological or Non-Autopositional)
Non-autopositional a priori extracted from the autopositional transcendence of philosophy and constituting the last noetic determination of the force (of) thought or the subject-Stranger.
The concept of distance functions as a general rule in an implicit way along the interior of “philosophical distinctions;” for example, the distinction of the given which imposes itself [...]
Filed under: Uncategorized | Tagged: Distance, dual, essence of science, existing-subject-Stranger, given-without-givenness, real essence | Leave a Comment »